I was impressed with the question and answer forum produced by Pastor Rick Warren at
The event was a huge landmark in that its unique format was exquisite. It reworked the definition of debate. Or rather it asked the question of why we even have debates. After all, we don’t really care how a potential President can do in a debate format. Is that the skill-set that is most important for our leader? Or is the process of an election the one where we really get to hear what the opponents think about an issue? Isn’t it even better when we can hear each man reflect on the same question without worrying about countering the other’s position?
I don’t care how McCain feels about Obama’s point of view. I can make up my own mind about how I feel about each man’s position. Isn’t that what is really wrong with the process today? The goal is for us to listen to both sides and for us to decide which one makes the most sense. Yet hundreds of millions of dollars are spent each election cycle on candidates telling us how we should feel about their opponent’s views.
I hope this format will be used again. Having said that, I know it probably will not be agreed upon by Obama’s side. It’s a loser for him. He is good at slipping issues and winding his way through meaningless rhetoric. That has worked for him to this point. But 30 minutes later, when his opponent is asked the identical question and gives a straightforward knowledgeable answer, the difference is there for the world to see. On questions of sacrifice, Obama waxed eloquent. But McCain held up his own life as the standard. On the question of crossing the aisle to work with the other side for the good of the country, the outcome was the same. Obama tried to appear noble. McCain reflected on his life.
When
So here is the bottom line. Will we elect a man who has never ever walked the walk but has a gift for talking it, posturing, and waving his hand to his adoring fans? Or will we elect a man who has personally withstood tests of war, tests of ethics, tests of allegiance, tests of faith, and tests of courage? And when he waves to the public, it looks awkward. After years of torture, after refusing to be released because his fellow prisoners had been imprisoned longer, his arms and shoulders just don’t move that direction anymore.
4 comments:
Show me your faith by what you say and I'll show you mine by what I do!!!! Great post my friend.
Re:Messiah for President
Those who have already found their Messiah, don't need to look for another one and are not vulnerable to any such "Messiahs." Dennis Prager said that last week and I thought it was very insightful, especially from a Jewish person's perspective. He also said (or implied) that those who have not found their Messiah are vulnerable to finding or creating one on their own. I really hadn't thought of that until he pointed it out. Now it seems so obvious. I would add that we all need a Messiah. Some are so desperate that they will unconsciously create one on their own.
Anonymous Sister
I liked the format, that you could hear what each had to say without them interuppting each other or out shouting each other, like on those other types of shows. It then left me free to decide who really had depth and who just said what the media darlings want to hear. hb
I too, found the Saddleback forum intriging... You were able to discern the basic differences between the two men, without the retoric from the press!!!
Until this point I was not sold on the candidate of my party...
and now that he has chosen his running mate, I am even more intriged.
Post a Comment